This book advances a coherent statement of defensive realism as a theory of strategy for our time. Theoretical perspectives on international relations in asia. Defensive realists recognizes the cost of war and assume that it usually emanates from irrational forces in a society. In recent years an outpour of debate and exchange within the realist tradition has captured the attention of scholars. Mearsheimer says the disposition to aggression is the product of the constant search for survival in a world of uncertainty, offensive military capability, and a changing distribution of power. States do not cooperate, except during temporary alliances, but constantly seek to diminish their competitors power and to enhance their own. Many scholars have attempted to create schemes classifying the different. Defensive realism has recently come under attack from critics of realism and even from fellow realists. Mearsheimers world offensive realism and the struggle for. Defensive realists state that countries with a strong willingness to balance power counterbalance and. What is the offensedefense balance and can we measure it. Snyder rejects mearsheimers view of the security dilemma as a synoptic statement of offensive realism. Offensive versus defensive realism contemporary arab affairs.
From offensive to defensive realism a social evolutionary interpretation of chinas security strategy tang shiping this chapter has two principal goals, one theoretical and one empirical. Types of realism in international relations theory flashcards. The typologies of realism liu feng and zhang ruizhuang much more than a single theory, realism is a school of thought containing numerous related branches. Project muse mearsheimers worldoffensive realism and. Offensive realism, the bush doctrine, and the 2003 iraq war theoria. Which structural realist theory offers the best guide for us. It fundamentally differs from defensive realism by depicting great powers. Offense, defense, and international politics by charles l. Domestic politics and international ambition ithaca, n. Security seeking under anarchy defensive realism revisited. Defensive realism sees states as seeking security rather than power, valuing what they have more than what they desire.
Offensive realism believes that states are inherently aggressive either by nature or because of an archy, andor that. Offensive realism in brief in its simplest form, my theory maintains that the basic structure of the international system forces states concerned about their security to compete. Offensive realism contributions and criticism theoretical. John mearsheimers theory of offensive realism and the. Defensive realism and chinese maritime strategy abstract the development and recent operations of the peoples liberation army navy plan is one of the most pressing issues in the security structure of asia. Introduction calling plays offensive numbering system. Defensive realism gives a better account of the concert of europe, because it combines structural realism with nonrealist theories of state preferences. Project muse mearsheimers worldoffensive realism and the.
Offensive realism holds that the anarchic nature of the international system is responsible for the promotion of aggressive state behavior in international politics. During the cold war era, we had only one country, russia, to worry about. Besides waltz, theory of international politics, other examples of defensive realism. Among defensive realism s most prominent theories is that of offense defensive theory which states that there is an inherent balance in technology, geography, and doctrine that favors either the attacker or defender in battle. Neorealism therefore works from realisms five base theoretical assumptions as outlined by offensive neorealist scholar john j. Structural realism, or neorealism, is a theory of international relations that says power is the most important factor in international relations. Understanding this would provide a better guide to whether mearsheimer or waltz, assuming they are the only theoretical options, offers the best approach.
Underpinning his skepticism of chinas peaceful rise is a compelling formulation of offensive realism. What is the offense defense balance and can we measure it. In contrast, offensive realists state that great powers can secure themselves only by maximizing their own power mearsheimer 2001, 21. Throughout this essay i have discussed two prominent differences between waltzs offensive and mearsheimers defensive structural realism.
I focus on whether mearsheimer succeeds in this endeavour. Because the world has firmly evolved from an offensive realism world in the past to a defensive realism world in which we live today, defensive realism is an appropriate guide for security strategy in our time. The discussion in chapters 2 and 4 makes it evident that the way to cope with uncertainty over others intentions constitutes a critical point of divergence between offensive realism on the one side and defensive realism and other nonoffensive realism approaches on the other tang 2008a. Sep 15, 2016 offensive realism is a structural theory belonging to the neorealist school of thought first postulated by john mearsheimer that holds the anarchic nature of the international system responsible. The theoretical foundations of defensive realism were laid by robert jervis, cooperation under the security dilemma, world politics, vol. The international system is inherently anarchic according to the school of realism of international relations theory. Offensive or defensive realism ghazala yasmin jalil institute of. Toward a material and systemic foundation for offensive and defensive realism, 447. Offensive realism is a structural theory belonging to the neorealist school of thought first postulated by john mearsheimer that holds the anarchic nature of the international system responsible. Glaser and chaim kaufmann offense defense theory offers an optimistic view of international politics based on the argument that war can be prevented if defense gains an advantage over offense. Thus, defensive realism theories can account for the sustained levels of cooperation between the u. Types of realism in international relations theory. Survival and security defensive realism cooperation and coordination to achieve. More fundamental criticisms of offensive realism have come from shiping tang, fear in international politics.
Offensive realists highlight the importance of relative power. Great powers, according to this theory, are perpetually seeking ways to gain power over their rivals, toward the ultimate goal of hegemony. These are competitors that seek to explain the same phenomena and cut across the classicalneo divide. It finds its foundation in kenneth waltzs theory of international politics, in. In international relations, defensive realism is a variant of political realism. To begin with, scholars have pointed out several logical issues within mearsheimers offensive realism. This supports the claim that the difference between these two structural realism approaches is 11 hamilton and rathbun, scarce differences. The arena with no overarching central authority above the individual collection of sovereign states within which international politics takes place is known as. Pdf structural realismoffensive and defensive realism. They are also two representatives for defensive realism and offensive realism subdivisions of structural realism.
Defense realism predicts that anarchy on the world stage causes states to become obsessed with security. What is the difference between offensive realism and. International journal of business and social science vol. In contrast to a simple difference in semantics, the theories of offensive and defensive realism are two, totally different approaches to an identical starting premise. The current paper defensive versus offensive realism is aimed to describe the differences and similarities between defensive and offensive realism, explaining that offensive and defensive realism vary in how they see power and the states demand for power. Structural realism holds that the nature of the international structure. Overviews of the offensive realismdefensive realism debate include. However, defensive realism is a more nuanced explanation of chinas rise and the operations of its navy. Neorealism and the balance of power in southeast asia 2016 6 paradigm. View defensive realism research papers on academia. This theory sees china as a state seeking power, and eventually hegemony, in its region.
Peter yannopoulos associate professor brock university, st. In examining both theories and iranian history, a clearer picture will emerge showing iranian interests, motivations, and endgame. Offensive realism, while also based on anarchy, does not come to that conclusion. It adds to our understanding of defensive realism as a grand theory of ir in particular and our understanding of ir in general and contributes to the ongoing debates among major paradigms of international relations. First outlined by kenneth waltz in his 1979 book theory of international politics, structural realism is subdivided into two factions. For classical realism, however, the source of powerseeking behavior does not originate from the nature of states but from the nature of humans to lust for power termed animus dominandi by morgenthau. Download file to see previous pages the main differences between offensive and defensive realism are based on variations on how they see power and how much power is enough. It adds to our understanding of defensive realism as a grand theory of ir. A social evolutionary interpretation of chinas security strategy tang shipping. Neo realism and the balance of power in southeast asia 2016 6 paradigm. In particular, defensive realists argue that structural factors limit how much power states. I have been thinking a lot about mearsheimers formulation of offensive realism.
John mearsheimer offensive realism in brief genius. Mearsheimer himself casts waltz as the leading defensive realist and his pri mary target. The plan itself was founded in 1949 and has evolved in its focus throughout its existence. Below i discuss the four categories of realist theory and how the offensive defensive dichotomy transcends the distinction between neorealism. After the terrorist attacks on september 11, 2001, the us was forced to examine and alter its foreign policy. Indeed, my position is considerably closer to mearsheimers than waltz. Defensive neorealism is a structural theory that is part of structural realism, also known as neorealism, which is a subset of the realist school of thought in international relations theory. John mearsheimer is one of these pessimists and arguably one of the most prominent skeptics of chinas peaceful rise referring to chinas foreign policy which has sought to mitigate the china threat school of thought. Mar 01, 2014 pulling together the two analysis of power and intentions, combined with the understanding of chinas rise as aiming to gain regional hegemony, i was able to conclude that waltzs defensive realism offers the best guide to us policymakers. The field of international relations now has at least two varieties of structural realism, 2 probably three kinds of offensive realism, 3 end page 149 and several types of defensive realism, 4 in addition to neoclassical, contingent, specific, and generalist realism. I compare offensive realism mainly to waltzs theory, because mearsheimer himself casts waltz as the leading defensive realist and his primary target. The theoretical goal is to advance a social evolutionary approach for understanding states security strategy or foreign policy in general. Defensive realism and the concert of europe cambridge core. Defensive realism posits that states seek security rather than power, making the international system less predatory and less prone to conflict.
Defensive realism proposes that states are generally more concerned with. From current affairs to general interests and factual anecdotes, profolus continues to strive to become a premier source of information and a valuable education website for knowledgeseekers. Defensive neorealism is a structural theory derived from the school of neorealism in international relations theory. Not that i think that the theory isnt a radical improvement over neorealism. Profolus is an information website covering topics and stories about business and markets, science and technology, the environment, and society and culture. Which structural realist theory offers the best guide for.
This type of pass exploits the intensity and aggressiveness of a defense. Thus, one of the major differences between defensive realism and offensive realism centers on their respective interpretations and expansions of the general assumptions of realism. Based on cultural differences in regulatory focus theory higgins, 1997, i predicted that chinese would emphasize defense and defensive strategies more than canadians, whereas canadians would emphasize offense and offensive strategies more than chinese. Defensive realism looks at states as rational players who are the primary actors in world affairs. Neorealism and the balance of power in southeast asia. I compare offensive realism mainly to waltzs theory, because. Offensive realism a theory developed by john mearsheimer, in contrast with defensive realism. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Most important difference is that defensive variety argues that anarchy only provides incentives for expansion under certain conditions, while offensive variety holds that anarchy always provides incentives for expansion. To claim that states would pass up costfree opportunities for power and in. Other articles where offensive realism is discussed.
From mearsheimer to jervis, european journal of international relations 16, 1 2010. Realism liberalism constructivism main actors states states, mncs, international organizations states, transnational knowledge communities and moral entrepreneurs primary goals of states pursuit of national interest. The terms aggressive realism or offensive realism and defensive realism originated in jack snyder, myths of empire. Offensive and defensive realism national chengchi university. Nothing in the logic of defensive realism precludes limited opportunistic expansion,12 particularly into power. Defensive and offensive strategies for market success dr. Even though offensive realists may accept that states may cooper. I conclude that the book is a major theoretical advance. A social evolutionary interpretation of chinas security strategy tang shipping tang shipping on. Critics of realism, such as andrew moravcsik and jeffrey legro, fault various defensive realist theories for positing a role for domestic politics, elite belief systems and misperceptions, and international insti. Realism can explain both why the eu is being pulled into this business and why it is failing to be. Defensive realists argue that maintaining the power balance is the best way to safeguard the status quo and secure the state waltz 1979, 126.
Defensive realism sees power as a means of attaining stability or security, while offensive realism sees power as both means and ends for political stability. He argues that offensive realisms positing of all states as revisionists removes the central propositionuncertainty about other states intentionson. Oct, 2016 defensive neorealism is a structural theory derived from the school of realism in international relations theory. It finds its foundation in kenneth waltzs theory of international politics, in which waltz argues that the anarchical structure of the international system encourages states to maintain moderate and reserved policies to attain security. In his book, waltz elaborates a set of core principles of.
In recent years and still today, we find ourselves trying to. Offensive realism is a structural theory belonging to the neorealist school of thought put forward by john mearsheimer in response to defensive realism. Discussions of both the chinese navy and chinas rise generally continue to be dominated by offensive realist thinking. Defensive neorealism is a structural theory derived from the school of realism in international relations theory. The preceding chapters clarify several critical areas of confusion that have come to obscure our understanding of the critical differences between defensive realism and offensive realism, redefine the security dilemma as the linchpin concept of defensive realism more rigorously, and resolve the critical question of security dilemma and war.
585 600 579 293 1446 1218 707 123 1470 904 425 744 158 1234 940 667 827 102 1321 801 537 685 1236 299 232 1224 248 182 1319 908 639 1164 356 807 1239